Southern Water Done Well graphic banner

Option 1: Jointly-owned Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) - Council's Preferred Option

It is proposed we would jointly own the organisation with our Southern Water Done Well partners: Central Otago District Council, Gore District Council, and Waitaki District Council. The organisation’s composition may change in the future, depending on the consultation outcome or whether other councils want to join or leave the group.

As a multi-council water services delivery organisation, we would be able to access significantly more funding for water services through the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA) - up to 500% of operating revenues, subject to meeting prudent credit criteria.

This is a much higher borrowing limit than what individual councils can access if they manage water services on their own.

We could improve water infrastructure faster and more efficiently by developing a smart funding strategy and accelerating investment. This would mean better network performance, quicker upgrades, and more reliable services for our communities.

Most importantly, this model ensures that the money collected for water services will be spent on maintaining and improving the system. It gives consumers confidence that water infrastructure is properly funded, meets all public health and environmental protection regulatory standards, and secures long-term service delivery.

Map and demographic information of the 4 district councils.

How would it work?

Flow chart of joint CCO structure.

Upside versus Downside

  • The Upside

    • Consumers would pay less for water services than under our other two options.
    • Bigger is better! Spreading costs across multiple councils makes water services more affordable for communities than if each council managed them alone.
    • A larger, well-structured entity is better equipped to meet strict water services regulations and reporting requirements.
    • Councils remain directly involved through the shareholders’ group, ensuring a community voice and that the activities reflect community priorities.
    • A combined organisation can attract top industry expertise, operate more efficiently, and standardise service delivery.
    • Would be able to access higher levels of debt funding from the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA).
    • Strategic procurement - buying in bulk and establishing longer-term contracts.
    • Standardisation of asset management systems, practices and data will improve planning across the Districts.
    • A shared workforce increases resilience to staff vacancies and provides improved career opportunities across the Districts.
    • ‘First mover advantage’ for Councils forming the CCO to design a solution that works for them.
    • Financial separation of water debt (and revenue). This will reduce pressure on council balance sheets and free up more investment capacity for each council should they wish to use it.
  • The Downside

    • Establishing a jointly owned CCO to serve multiple locations will be complex and expensive. However, establishment costs would be debt-funded to ensure they are shared equitably between today’s and tomorrow’s customers.
    • Potential loss of jobs, internal council expertise, and understanding of water services over time.
    • No hands-on council control over managing water assets and how services are delivered.
    • May not be affordable in the long term without additional councils joining the CCO.

For a full overview of each option please refer to our Consultation Document.

Extracts from the consultation document are also available here:

How do the options compare?

Levels of Service & Money Matters


How do the options compare?

Click here to see a visual guide comparing the three options.


Read more about the other options

Follow the links to find out more, then have your say.

Option 2 - A stand-alone Council Controlled Organisation
(a CCO set up solely by Clutha District Council)
Option 3 - An in-house business unit
(similar to what we do now, but with significant changes to meet legislative requirements)